BeyondERP.Subscribe

DEC-AP-001 · Design decision

What level of invoice matching control applies, and does it vary by spend category?

A decision a human must make between defensible options. The configuration records it governs cannot be completed until it is taken.

Partly verified

Options

ATwo-way globally — lowest friction, weakest control.
BThree-way globally — strongest control, blocks any unreceipted spend.
CThree-way default with two-way overrides for defined vendor/item groups — strongest fit, highest config and maintenance cost.

Recorded recommendation

RecommendationC, where indirect spend is material. A or B only where the spend profile is genuinely uniform.
Depends on
  • Whether goods receipting is performed consistently
  • Whether services spend runs through POs
OwnerFinance process owner + AP lead
FDD wordingNot recordedUnverified

Configuration it governs

Verification

Verified byMicrosoft business process catalog July 2026
EnvironmentNot recorded
NoteTranscribed verbatim from the DEC-AP-001 worked example in the v0.1 step model. fdd_wording is a placeholder in the source and is left null rather than drafted, since the wording is owner IP and not derivable. Corroborated by the July 2026 catalog, which splits the invoice matching scenario 75.50.020.300 into exactly this fork at level 5: 75.50.020.300.100 Perform two-way invoice matching and 75.50.020.300.200 Perform three-way invoice matching. That is structural confirmation that the two-way / three-way choice is the real decision point, not a preference. Option C, the mixed model, has no catalog equivalent - it is Beyond ERP ground.
Still to checkFdd_wording
Sourcehttps://aka.ms/BusinessProcessCatalog

← Atlas Hub